Hjem
Nyheter
Oversettelse
Prosjekt
Forum
Hjelp
Brukere
Logg Inn
Bli Medlem
. .
•Profil
veaysmer
•Alle oversettelser
▪▪Etterspurte oversettelser
•
Favorittoversettelser
•Liste av prosjekter
•Innboks
▪Gratis SprÃ¥k-veksling
•English
•Türkçe
•Français
•Español
•Italiano
•Português brasileiro
•Deutsch
•Română
•عربي
•Русский
•Svenska
•Ελληνικά
•Български
•עברית
•Shqip
•Srpski
•Nederlands
•Dansk
•Português
•Polski
•汉语(简体)
•Lietuvių
▪▪Norsk
•فارسی
•Suomi
•Hrvatski
•日本語
•Català
•Esperanto
•한국어
•Українська
•Føroyskt
•नेपाली
•Kiswahili
Alle oversettelser
Søk
Etterspurte oversettelser - veaysmer
Søk
Kildespråk
Språket det skal oversettes til
Resultater 1 - 6 av ca. 6
1
140
Kildespråk
Spørsmål for denne tekst er "Kun lydelsen".
goya dönemin kasvetini, donuklugunu, infazın...
goya bu resimde, dönemin kasvetini, donuklugunu, infazın korkunçlugunu ve ölüm gibi kacınılmaz sonunu, mimiklerle, duruş ve renklerle bize hissettirmeyi basarmistir.
Oversettelsen er fullført
Goya's painting
411
Kildespråk
Spørsmål for denne tekst er "Kun lydelsen".
Examples of Goya's technique used to accomplish...
Examples of Goya's technique used to accomplish this effect are seen in his dynamic use chiaroscuro,* his particular composition of facial expressions and body posturing and raw, candid brush strokes. His combined techniques work in their entirety to amplify this painting's overall emotional appeal. This essay claims that Goya's technical treatment of The Third of May 1808 suitably commands attention and arouses the nationalistic sentiments of the painting’s Spanish audience.
Oversettelsen er fullført
Goya
736
Kildespråk
Spørsmål for denne tekst er "Kun lydelsen".
None of us can ever retrieve that innocence...
This is the case, today, with the very idea of content itself. Whatever it may have been in the past, the idea of content is today mainly a hindrance, a nuisance, a subtle or not so subtle philistinism.
Though the actual developments in many arts may seem to be leading us away from the idea that a work of art is primarily its content, the idea still exerts an extraordinary hegemony. I want to suggest that this is because the idea is now perpetuated in the guise of a certain way of encountering works of art thoroughly ingrained among most people who take any of the arts seriously. What the overemphasis on the idea of content entails is the perennial, never consummated project of interpretation. And, conversely, it is the habit of approaching works of art in order to interpret them that sustains the fancy that there really is such a thing as the content of a work of art.
Oversettelsen er fullført
hiçbirimiz tekrar bu masumluğa ulaşamayız...
1